TRYNGOLZA achieved statistically significant, robust triglyceride reductions at 6 months in adults with severe hypertriglyceridemia (sHTG)1
statistically significant mean change in fasting triglycerides with TRYNGOLZA 80 mg compared with placebo at Month 6* (P<0.0001) in addition to background lipid-lowering therapy
| TRYNGOLZA 50 mg | TRYNGOLZA 80 mg |
|---|---|
| 1169 Mean baseline (mg/dL) | 1169 Mean baseline (mg/dL) |
| −63% | −72% |
| placebo-corrected difference from baseline to Month 6*† | placebo-corrected difference from baseline to Month 6*† |
| TRYNGOLZA 50 mg | TRYNGOLZA 80 mg |
|---|---|
| 968 Mean baseline (mg/dL) | 1088 Mean baseline (mg/dL) |
| −49% | −55% |
| placebo-corrected difference from baseline to Month 6*† | placebo-corrected difference from baseline to Month 6*† |
*Average of Weeks 25 and 27.1
†Reached statistical significance (P<0.0001).1
SELECT IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
Adverse Reactions for sHTG
Most common adverse reactions in patients with sHTG (incidence ≥2% higher than placebo) were injection site reactions and liver enzyme increases.
The rapid reduction and consistent triglyceride control your patients need with TRYNGOLZA1
TRYNGOLZA demonstrated statistically significant decreases in fasting triglycerides at Month 6 and Month 12.1
Monthly dosing with TRYNGOLZA provided consistent triglyceride lowering throughout the 12-month treatment period.1
Beyond triglycerides: multiple atherogenic lipid markers
Atherogenic burden reduction (Total ApoB, non–HDL-C) with mechanism-driven lipid remodeling.1-5
- Accelerated TRL clearance with apoC-III inhibition resulted in a favorable shift in overall lipid profile with increases in LDL-C1-5
Mean percentage change in HDL-C compared with placebo at 6 months2:
- 64% with TRYNGOLZA 50 mg
- 85% with TRYNGOLZA 80 mg
LIMITATION: Data shown were exploratory analyses; observed results should be interpreted with caution.
Mean percentage change in HDL-C compared with placebo at 6 months2:
- 58% with TRYNGOLZA 50 mg
- 70% with TRYNGOLZA 80 mg
LIMITATION: Data shown were exploratory analyses; observed results should be interpreted with caution.
*Reached statistical significance (P<0.05).1
Analysis results were based on an analysis-of-covariance model with treatment, 2 randomization stratification factors (qualification fasting triglycerides ≥880 mg/dL [yes/no] and prior history of pancreatitis within 10 years prior to screening [yes/no]) as the fixed effects, and baseline value as a covariate; missing data were imputed using a placebo-washout multiple-imputation approach.1
apo=apolipoprotein; HDL-C=high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C=low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TRL=triglyceride-rich lipoprotein.
Observed triglyceride levels <880 mg/dL, <500 mg/dL, and <150 mg/dL at 12 months1
>85% of patients reached triglyceride levels <500 mg/dL with TRYNGOLZA.1
*Achievement of triglyceride levels <880 mg/dL, <500 mg/dL, and <150 mg/dL at 12 months among patients with baseline levels above these thresholds.1
†LIMITATION: Data shown were exploratory analyses; observed results should be interpreted with caution.
TRYNGOLZA is the first therapy indicated to reduce the risk of acute pancreatitis (AP) events in adults with severe hypertriglyceridemia1
reduction in the adjudicated acute pancreatitis event rate with TRYNGOLZA 50 mg compared with placebo in addition to background lipid-lowering therapy1
DOSE COMPARED WITH PLACEBO1
| TRYNGOLZA 50 mg RR: 0.09 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.42) | -91% |
| TRYNGOLZA 80 mg RR: 0.24 (95% CI: 0.08, 0.69) | -76% |
Pancreatitis events were assessed as a secondary endpoint in an integrated analysis of CORE and CORE2. Events were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Revised Atlanta Diagnostic Criteria.1
RR=rate ratio.
SELECT IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
Adverse Reactions for sHTG
Most common adverse reactions in patients with sHTG (incidence ≥2% higher than placebo) were injection site reactions and liver enzyme increases.
85% reduction in AP events (RR: 0.15; 95% Cl: 0.05, 0.40) in the pooled TRYNGOLZA group1
- 17 patients (4.8%) in the pooled placebo group experienced 22 events of adjudicated AP1
- 5 patients (0.7%) in the combined pooled TRYNGOLZA group experienced 7 events1
Pancreatitis events were assessed as a secondary endpoint in an integrated analysis of CORE and CORE2. Events were adjudicated by a blinded, independent committee according to the Revised Atlanta Diagnostic Criteria. Event rates over 53 weeks were compared between pooled TRYNGOLZA (50 mg and 80 mg) and pooled placebo using a negative binomial regression model.1
The time was censored at Week 53 or at the posttreatment follow-up termination date, whichever occurred first. The time to the first adjudicated pancreatitis event was compared between the pooled TRYNGOLZA treatment group and the placebo group using a log-rank test, stratified by study identifier (CORE or CORE2).1
Among high-risk patients, TRYNGOLZA reduced AP event rates by 83% vs placebo1
- The overall treatment effect was predominantly observed in the prespecified high-risk subgroup of patients (n=141) with baseline fasting TGs ≥880 mg/dL and a prior history of AP1
- 25/29 AP events (86%) occurred in high-risk patients1
- In this subgroup (N=141), the pooled TRYNGOLZA group demonstrated an 83% reduction (RR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.47) in the AP event rate relative to placebo1
Low numbers needed to treat (NNT) were observed in patients most at risk of AP2,3
The NNT communicates how many patients on average would need to be on a given treatment for a defined period to benefit compared with not using the therapy. The lower the NNT, the more effective the treatment.4,5
TGs ≥500 mg/dL
NNT=20*
TGs ≥880 mg/dL
NNT=9*
TGs ≥880 mg/dL
+ prior AP history
NNT=4*
* LIMITATION: Data shown were exploratory analyses; observed results should be interpreted with caution.
What is number needed to treat (NNT)?
NNT is an important measure of efficacy
- The NNT communicates how many patients on average would need to be on a given treatment for a defined period to benefit compared with not using the therapy4,5
- The lower the NNT, the more effective the treatment5
| NNT Ratings7,8 | |
|---|---|
| NNT ≤6 | Represents exceptional clinical benefit |
| NNT <20 | Indicates strong clinical benefit |
| NNT 20–50 | Considered acceptable therapeutic benefit depending on the severity of the condition being prevented |
| NNT >50 | Generally represents marginal therapeutic benefit requiring careful consideration of treatment burden |
TG=triglyceride.
Reference: 1. TRYNGOLZA. Prescribing information. Ionis Pharmaceuticals.
References: 1. TRYNGOLZA. Prescribing information. Ionis Pharmaceuticals. 2. Marston NA, Bergmark BA, Alexander VJ, et al. Olezarsen for managing severe hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis risk. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(5):429-441. 3. Karwatowska-Prokopczuk E, Tardif JC, Gaudet D, et al. Effect of olezarsen targeting APOC-III on lipoprotein size and particle number measured by NMR in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. J Clin Lipidol. 2022;16(5):617-625. 4. Joshy J, Javed A, Kumar Singh M, Singh BP, Kumar R, Hussain S. Olezarsen: a next-generation antisense therapy for hypertriglyceridemia and familial chylomicronemia syndrome. Cureus. 2025;17(11):e96715. 5. Gaudet D, Pall D, Watts GF, et al. Plozasiran (ARO-APOC3) for severe hypertriglyceridemia: the SHASTA-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2024;9(7):620-630.
References: 1. Marston NA, Bergmark BA, Alexander VJ, et al. Olezarsen for managing severe hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis risk. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(5)(supplementary appendix):429-441. 2. Skulas-Ray AC, Wilson PWF, Harris WS, et al. Omega-3 fatty acids for the management of hypertriglyceridemia: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;140(12):e673-e691.
References: 1. TRYNGOLZA. Prescribing information. Ionis Pharmaceuticals. 2. Marston NA, Bergmark BA, Alexander VJ, et al. Olezarsen for managing severe hypertriglyceridemia and pancreatitis risk. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(5):429-441. 3. Kessler AS, Baum SJ, Kutrieb E, et al. Rates of acute pancreatitis and cardiovascular events among adults with severe or extreme hypertriglyceridemia in US clinical practice. Lipids Health Dis. 2025;24(1):252. 4. Christensen PM, Kristiansen IS. Number-needed-to-treat (NNT)—needs treatment with care. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;99(1):12-16. 5. Chesnaye NC, Ortiz A, van Diepen M, et al. How to interpret the number needed to treat for clinicians. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2026;41(3):437-444. 6. Data on file. REF-03403. Ionis Pharmaceuticals; 2026. 7. What are poor, acceptable, and great Number Needed to Treat (NNT) figures? Dr.Oracle AI. Updated December 13, 2025. Accessed May 5, 2026. https://www.droracle.ai/articles/612269/what-are-poor-acceptable-and-great-number-needed-to 8. Understanding Number Needed to Treat (NNT) of 6. Praxis Medical Insights. Updated November 2, 2025. Accessed May 5, 2026. https://praxismed.org/article/c069283b-ae91-4a3f-af58-90d1cc3f2060